[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / abdl / asmr / hwndu / irc / just / strek / sw ]

/younglove/ - Child Love Discussion

Keep it clean and legal. Thanks.

Catalog

Winner of the 11th Attention-Hungry Games
/jp/ - You must be this high to post

/bane/ and /just/ stream on Saturday October 21
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 1 per post.


CAPTCHA is enabled for thread creation only, not for regular replies. Sorry for the inconvenience, but I only have limited tools to handle spam, and I don't want to disable Tor all together. If this doesn't help at least a bit, I'll disable CAPTCHA.

File: 24ab3157ddfc466⋯.jpg (731.22 KB, 2048x1365, 2048:1365, 1431803884200.jpg)

 No.35388[Reply]

Welcome to /younglove/, a discussion board aimed at people who are emotionally and/or sexually attracted to people of young ages, though everyone is welcome to post.

RULES

1. All global rules apply. That means no child pornography.

2. Only post “clean” photographs. This means fully clothed (no underwear or swim suits), no nudity and no erotic poses.

3. No flooding or commercial spam.

4. Do not post real world identification (aka dox).

5. No advocating violence against children.

 No.35389

Things To Consider

A pedophile is defined as someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children.

Sexual attraction to pubescent children is hebephilia, while sexual attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia.

Being a pedophile does not mean someone is, or ever will be, a child molester or rapist. Both molestation and rape are an action which involve a victim while pedophilia is a passive attraction.

Having a sexual attraction to children isn’t illegal, acting on such desires can be however.

While sexual attraction is the key factor in being a pedophile, many pedophiles choose to avoid contact with children completely. Others wish to be close to a child or children while abstaining from any sexual behavior.

Opinions on whether or not sexual activity with a minor is moral differ greatly and such discussion is welcome here, but while this is not a rule, please do not discuss having done anything that could be considered a crime involving a minor. Doing so can put the community at risk.

Thank you.




 No.39309[Reply]

People would have to accept us as human beings who improve the lives of children. Instead of the monster they portray us as. I already have come out to my family and they are cool with us.

46 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39593

>>39588

>The fact of the matter

No, that's not the fact of the matter, that's you yet again lying about things you know nothing about.

>She can't *not* talk to the police, dumbass.

she ABSOLUTELY does not have to talk to the police. the only thing shes actually legally compelled to do is give testimony in court. the cops intimidate people into giving interviews all the time. they dont have the right to do it, but people rarely fight them on it. no one, no matter who they are or how they relate to a case, are legally obligated to speak to the police. the police are not the courts. as for the judge, he overstepped himself and his threats of contempt against her would absolutely not hold up if anyone, once again, bothered to fight it.

>All they have to do is throw her in jail for a week

which they didnt and couldnt do, and if anyone fought it at all they couldnt even have held her for the 2 hours that they did. the only reason they got away with it is because no one fought it and in fact the father actively encouraged it.

>it's impossible to guess

You were trying to pass off your guess as an actual statement made by the cp producers, because you're a compulsive liar.

>and not in countries that allow adult porn to be made

ignoring the entire asian continent and much of eastern europe, of course.


 No.39598

>>39584

First degree felonies will still often be prosecuted even if the victim doesn't want to press charges for whatever reason.

For example it doesn't matter if the owner is cool with you intentionally burning down his house, the prosecutor and police will still want you in jail/prison for arson.


 No.39603

>>39582

>Anyone can file a report, but the only accuser as far as a court is concerned is the victim.

This is an irrelevant technicality. The fact of the matter is that it's a third party making the accusation.

>which they didnt and couldnt do, and if anyone fought it at all they couldnt even have held her for the 2 hours that they did.

That more recent girl was held for 3-4 days. Hold on, I'll try to find it.

>You were trying to pass off your guess as an actual statement made by the cp producers,

I still haven't seen you make any claim that that I'm wrong. Your dispute is purely with the form of my argument and not against the substance of it.

>because you're a compulsive liar.

Please don't pathologize me. I don't need your diagnoses.

>ignoring the entire asian continent and much of eastern europe, of course.

I'm not sure what you're implying. Producing porn is illegal in practically all of Asia and Eastern Europe, with the notable exceptions of Japan and the Czech Republic. The fact that CP studios don't exist in every country that's banned pornography does not refute my claim. Also, while not studios per se, CP is absolutely rampant in the Philippines where it's common for people in poor villages to make money by stripping and playing with their children on webcam.


 No.39613

>>39603

>This is an irrelevant technicality. The fact of the matter is that it's a third party making the accusation.

A component of law that is 100% irrevocably vital to making a case exist at all is not a technicality let alone irrelevant.

>I still haven't seen you make any claim that that I'm wrong. Your dispute is purely with the form of my argument and not against the substance of it.

I haven't seen you denying that you were caught bald faced lying. And I disputed it when I said your opinion is worthless because you are clueless to their actual motives.

>CP is absolutely rampant in the Philippines where it's common for people in poor villages to make money by stripping and playing with their children on webcam.

"its a dumb myth that cp is a 6 gorrillian dollar a year industry, except when its suits my stupid argument, then it totally is just. trust me goyim." -Namefag, 2017


 No.39614

>>39613

>A component of law that is 100% irrevocably vital to making a case exist at all is not a technicality let alone irrelevant.

I can't tell if you're being deliberately obtuse or if you just have an incredibly short attention span. The reason we're discussing this in the first place is that you claimed that the child is required to make the accusation against the adult in a statutory rape case. We've established that regardless of the child's legal status as the accuser, the child is not required to make any claims about the accused in order to reach a conviction.

>And I disputed it when I said your opinion is worthless

"You're wrong because I said so" is not an argument. Please try again.

>Child pornography is the Philippines' number one export and accounts for 2% of the country's GDP -Anon, 2017

See? I can do it, too.




 No.35887[Reply]

I would. I am tired of only my immediate family knowing. If I truly believe in the rights of children then why continue to hide? I rather show the world that I am willing to die for children than just claim many of us MAPs care more about children. I am sick of being a coward. I know I will get attacked and called names, but those who are not tired what do you think?

53 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39528

fuck no.

I would join a non-religious voluntary celibacy community/group if it appeared irl though.

What you are attracted to doesn't matter when you are celibate. In such a situation it is reasonable to keep it to yourself.

I mean what is even the point? To fuck kids in the open? Well I am against that. To gain acceptance? People don't need to accept what should remain private in the first place. Some people are attracted to animals, some to inanimate objects, and a bunch of other weird attractions. It shouldn't matter in someone's day to day life because it is a small private portion of it, not a persons defining characteristic.

Sex isn't everything, attraction isn't everything. Being a upstanding person of virtue is far more important.

So tell me what is the end goal? Is there a better alternative to sexualized identity politics to achieve that goal? Is that goal actually wise to chaise in the first place?


 No.39552

>>39520

>should intimacy be restricted to marriage and divorce prohibited?

In a ideal world yes


 No.39590

File: cbdcf3b6a86c8e9⋯.jpg (70.56 KB, 636x960, 53:80, d79a0c01f50d4d2eaabe9bb76d….jpg)

>>39552

So you are a far right traditionalist. I can't say I agree with you, being a supporter of sexual liberation, women's rights and gay rights.

You would approve of child marriage, then, seeing as it solves the issue of emotional attachment?


 No.39610

>>39590

I do not have a problem with child marriage in principle, but I do have a problem with how it is often practiced in the real world. Though this objection has more to due with cultural practices of those who still have child brides in modern society.

Marriage done in the mold of the civilized western tradition is what is best. I would have no objection to child marriage in that cultural system.


 No.39612

>>39610

>I do not have a problem with child marriage in principle

I certainly do, people have no reason at all to be getting tied down to one specific person until they've experienced at least a few years of adult independent life and seen what their options were.

>b-b-b-b-but they love each other!

Then they shouldn't have any problems waiting until the child is an adult.




File: c54d95973d79437⋯.jpg (107.67 KB, 342x340, 171:170, 23.jpg)

 No.37467[Reply]

I'm a 14 year old pedophile.

I'm non-exclusive, but my pedo aoa is 2-11. I like ages 2-6 the most, so generally preschoolers and kindergarteners.

I realized I'm a pedophile and I found CP a bit over a year ago.

This will be sort of an AMA - you can ask me, and I will ask you.

First of all - I think that children can consent.

Secondly - I also acknowledge the fact that children get traumatized because of sex with adults, but

Lastly - I think that it's because of the societal attitude towards pedophilia and practicing pedophilia.

Children are impressionable - tell them something and they'll believe it. Keep telling them they were abused and the "abuser" was a monster and they will believe it.

What are your opinions of this guys?

Also do you think there is any chance my pedophilia is just a phase?

tl;dr i'm 14, pedo, procontact and basically ask me questions and answer my questions

108 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39600

>>39599

I agree with everything you said, but I want to correct this:

> if you make it to adulthood you would be considered sub-middle school educate and be paid accordingly unless you got your GED.

That's actually false. Unschoolers are still seen as being home-educated and their parents give them a diploma.


 No.39601

>>39594

>im a dickless incompetent retard thats incapable of countering a single thing so i'll just shittalk.

cry faggot cry


 No.39604

>>39572

-Learning doesn't mean only learning school subjects. It's just acquiring knowledge in any way and can happen when doing anything. Infants are always learning, adults are always learning, and all the ages in between are always learning.

-In traditional homeschooling, parents choose what their kids do and learn, while in unschooling, the kids choose how they spend their day, and how long to spend on things they like.

-Some states and countries have certain requirements that make unschooling more diificult or impossible. Other states and countries have fewer or none, making it easy. It isn't the same everywhere and many unschoolers don't need to worry about "state regulated academic milestones". The girl in the blog (I read much of its content) is actually unschooled, and didn't have to learn school subjects, get graded, take exams, etc. The kids in the parenting blog also didn't have those requirements.

-I don't know exactly how Sudbury Schools are able to do what they do (it's probably because they're private), but the kids aren't required to meet certain milestones, and no parents and staff face any legal consequences.

-By "responsibility for their own education" they mean that the kids can learn what they want as it becomes relevant in their lives. No one makes them learn anything, or controls how they spend their day.

——————–

-Internal vs external motivation: "So, extrinsic motivation doesn't always have to be another person, but it is some outside demand, obligation, or reward that requires the achievement of a particular goal. Intrinsic motivation, however, is an internal form of motivation. You strive towards a goal for personal satisfaction or accomplishment."

>Not directly, but indirectly they certainly can. The oedipal complex is resolved essentially by forcing the child to no longer desire the mother. The child realizes that due to their circumstances the desire is unobtainable, so in that sense they are forced to change it.

Basically, if someone desires something, and the desire can'Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


 No.39607

>>39594

That is part of the reason why I have even barely posted around here. I still do enjoy exchanging opinions here every so often though, I believe, despite how this board is right now, that it has helped me grow in certain ways and appreciate that.

>>39599

I also agree with most of what you say. Allowing different varieties of education would allow for the child to choose which one they like best and to truly feel comfortable with their learning pace as well as themselves, since wherever it is they get educated, they spend most of their childhood indulging in said activity and while I understand that many people say "children must learn as much as they can", this is often replaced for the "memorizing and discipline behaviour" that schools often focuses on instead of improving the analytical capacity of children, so even if they do through all that, if they did not even like it or the education system was not actually effective then they will not even remember most of it. Heck, even I don't remember a lot of subjects that were "taught" (forced me to memorize to just empty it on a test and then forget about it) in school. I know, that if there were have been more learning systems available on my end and with my parents approaching them, then perhaps I would have been more intrigued in the subjects, depending on how they approached by the educator, or myself.

That said, I never had the opportunity to get home schooled or unschooled, but I have met people who had, and as KaluKoi posted, I have also gone through some blogs about the subject and read things here and there, and I really like the idea of having an open, flexible and wide extension of education systems to choose, rather than being told that you have to do this and that because of the sole reason the government tells you to and because they also demand it from businesses to require such.

>All that changed under Bush, no child left behind, and the rise of corporate backed standardization of curriculum.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.39611

>>39604

>-Learning doesn't mean only learning school subjects.

I'm only talking about state mandated education. The form that is required by law. Humans are too unique to make generic comments about what kind of learning is best so I'm not going to bother.

>Basically, if someone desires something, and the desire can't be obtained, they'll eventually lose it?

They usually come up with secondary reasons why they lose the desire. For example if you desire to move somewhere exotic and start a new life but due to various reasons just can't, you'll probably tell yourself "oh that's not really what I wanted to do anyway because of this reason or that" instead of just admitting "I just can't do it".

Sexual desire is usually different and I'm not talking about pedos no longer desiring children, before anyone gets on my case about that.

>I meant control in parts of their life where it isn't necessary.

I never said force was always necessary I'm saying that in 99.9~% of children's lives force is going to have to be used at some point or another.

>how often would the kid ignore that and still want to be with them? They aren't idiots.

>do you think your kid will simply not care about the danger?

You are clearly a sheltered naive fool because even adults let themselves get fooled and manipulated by predators from time to time. I don't expect it to happen with my own child, but that's not the point.

The point is that there are real substantiated limits to your ideology of supposed total freedom.




File: aa7aa7a247de9a7⋯.png (57.79 KB, 512x296, 64:37, youtube_logo4.png)

 No.33370[Reply]

I recently have came across two pro-pedo YouTube channels both users have some very good ideas and opinions just thought i share them with you guys.

Omnipolitics16

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4kdEGVoX4PNK7WJL_v5mxA/featured

Cart O'Graph

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKjntJ7dHxUY7B61QEsB1Dw

10 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.33544

>>33516

I've already explained this all in the War Room readme

There's far more win than there was a year ago

Only possibly a lack of high view count stuff from years ago on newfags' playlists due to flaggers

But there are more girls, and they wear less, with higher quality cameras, than ever before for people in the original content, under 1k views business

Is this place in moderated mode? Disregard if dupicate post


 No.33561

I hear "pro-pedo" that person must be in favor of people like me that need high-efficiency masturbation material to save hours daily

Nope, they actually don't care about that they just go on about why society should lower the age of consent, as if those younger girls want pedophiles

And I warned Omnipolitics16 very early on he has nobody to blame but himself, and every time it's always someone like him


 No.33562

File: d3c16571583fbb5⋯.jpg (138.87 KB, 1080x1080, 1:1, 14574021_1354575164580665_….jpg)

>>33561

I talked with him and he didn't listen to any of the advice. Not in regards to video quality, to speaking to the public, to security, nothing. Maybe he listened regarding getting the message out there and thus he was discovered, but not following anything else and being an idiot using skype thereafter…good riddance.

tbqh the 'lad arguably deserves prison at this point

Honestly in the way he speaks I doubt he's even a pedophile.

Fifty fifty (at best) between bottom-barrel and non-pedo


 No.35605

I'm love


 No.39609

gf




File: 04bdcb0c4b09618⋯.jpg (79.75 KB, 780x433, 780:433, no.jpg)

 No.39429[Reply]

The universal theme here is "I'm attracted to children, but I'm not a monster". Unfortunately most of what I'm reading is from monsters who've deluded themselves into thinking they're not, to the point where they believe they can convince rational minds.

Personally, I believe age of consent laws in most western nations are spot on. A child under the age of 12 should not be having sexual intercourse, especially not with an adult who ALWAYS without exception holds a position of power due to the intelligence and experience a child ties to age. Over the age of 12 children are usually more sexually developed (but not always, and despite your inane fantasy universe where you believe you can mold and form them into a perfect, healthy sexual adult by fucking them, you are infinitely more likely to do damage than you are to improve their lives). I'm highly attracted to 10-12, but would not in a million years argue that I should be allowed to engage with them sexually. I'm not a rapist, I'm more the kind and caring type but that is utterly irrelevant when messing with the ONLY chance this little person has to develop is walking a razor's edge. And no, you aren't the unappreciated psychological genius you think you are, and you don't know how to navigate the developing sexual mind of an underage human being.

I'm sitting here, looking at the title of this board, and I just realized this place is one of the worst pedophilia infested shitholes on the internet. This is worse than downloading child pornography. This is an echo chamber where dumb fucking opinions get repeated over and over until the lot of you disgusting cunts actually start believing them. Nobody comes here and leaves caring more about kids. It's a factory that turns guys who are attracted to children into guys who believe there's nothing wrong with fucking a kid and the world just doesn't get it.

Downloading a child pornographic video is terrible. Enveloping someone in asinine rhetoric until they go out and actually fuck a kid believing it's alright? That's this place, and I hope it burns to the fucking ground.

34 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39587

>>39585

>What makes you think that?

Everyone here seems to hate psychology and psychologists when they don't really have any understanding of either and treat them as the anti-pedo boogeyman when its not really their fault. psychology has always been hijacked by society for various purposes, but its breaking out of it and the current model is that adult-child sex abuse doesnt necessarily lead to lasting harm and that reinforcing victimhood is a very bad thing. Therapists do not put thoughts in kids minds about how theyre "supposed" to feel and therapy itself is generally not geared towards changing feelings but changing behaviors. the reason many kids spend more time in therapy after the first few sessions is because a lot of kids that had sexual activity with adults show signs of "inappropriate" sexual behavior towards other children, and they want to curb that behavior.

>but society won't change unless these things improve first.

it starts with awareness and education, just like with everything else. and pedos need to be educated just like everyone else. you cant chain someone up and treat them like a monster their whole lives then just let them loose on the world and expect them to act civilized.


 No.39589

>>39560

The benefits to a child exploring sexuality and relationships are, as is somewhat obvious, faster emotional development. A child who has experience dating is better prepared for relationships as an adult. At least, this has always been the case in societies that did not repress sexuality.

>either way those accounts and testimonies do not override the overwhelming amount of accounts and testimonies to the contrary.

Sarah Goode's interviews indicate that the majority are confused about how to feel. From there we can hypothesize the only reason for their confusion is the conflict between their personal enjoyment of the act and the victim narrative they are hearing from society. Alternatively we are forced to go with the demonstrably false "sex is inherently harmful to children" theory.

If legislation is to be evaluated with reference to statistics on the prevalence of abuse and the extent of the damage it causes then it is imperative to get the facts straight. The Rind et al. study demonstrated that the severity of emotional trauma even from coerced sex is not always as extreme nor is it as prevalent as the mainstream consensus has been claiming.


 No.39591

>>39589

I don't believe sexual relationships develop emotions faster than any other kind of relationship.

> A child who has experience dating is better prepared for relationships as an adult.

The dynamics of an adult-child and an adult-adult relationships are totally different. It's like saying being an auto mechanic makes you better prepared for underwater welding. I mean, yea a little bit I guess, but it's still a whole new world you need to get accustomed to.


 No.39605

From observation, this debate seems to be on whether or not the possibility of abuse is worth the good relationships that could possibly form.

The sub-debate seems to be on whether or not more abuse would occur or more beneficial relationships would occur.

I'm not taking a side, I'm just observing.


 No.39606

>an adult who ALWAYS without exception holds a position of power due to the intelligence and experience a child ties to age.

I am smarter then you, that dosnt mean when you suck my dick because of you immense homolust that it is rape, I am not even a poster here I saw this in nerv center and wanted to point out how much of a faggot you are




File: 9dac0ecea1fe6e0⋯.jpg (80.86 KB, 690x468, 115:78, children-at-the-beach-nort….jpg)

 No.34016[Reply]

Would you move to North Korea as some sort of diplomat / foreign alibi government worker if it meant you had free access to children? You'd have to obey the government otherwise, never say anything negative, reveal any secrets or misbehave in any way, and never visit the outside world, but you can do what you want with the kids, no questions asked.

Would you take the bargain?

12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.38323

sounds like a forward-thinking regime


 No.38626

>>34016

Absolutely yes. I don't care about his regime or whatever crimes he does.

As a diplomat I'm getting treated good, as long as I behave, and having children at my disposal, oh yes, of course I would.


 No.39530

Life and liberty are my two most important principles.

Such a situation would be a violation of those principles both of myself and the children.


 No.39544

But that would mean no internet!

I would take the position as a chance to work as a double agent/spy.

The children have already been brainwashed and probably report directly to the N.Korean intelligence agency. I would simply show platonic loving kindness to the children but be vigilant not to let any info or wrong think slip in front of them. Even if I am not able to be effective as a operative I can at least make the lives of those children a bit better when they spend time with me.

One more thing, how are you able to preform your functions as a diplomat if you have no contact outside the country you are working?


 No.39596

Maybe if it wasn't North Korea and the children aren't forced, rather if I happen to engage in a consensual mutual relationship with someone under age the authorities would look the other way.

Under those circumstances (as well as being well compensated and allowed to enjoy outside media) I wouldn't mind being a propaganda spewing fake diplomat that plays by the party/dictators rules.

The reason I have a problem with North Korea is simply I would not want the pressure of trying to be a diplomat in their current situation. They are at the razors edge of total annihilation if they make the wrong misstep.




 No.39287[Reply]

Where can you find pedomoms

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39380

>>39378

Sleep around with single women with children until you find one.


 No.39395

Try looking for mothers who are into attachment parenting/ respectful parenting and unschooling, and who are more "hippie-like".


 No.39420

Be careful these women will get jealous and get you in trouble.


 No.39595

I don't know any mothers I'm 15! I just wanna know if someone knows someone or there's a kik group or a website where I can meet these women coz I wanna have sex with them. How am I supposed to sleep around at 15


 No.39597

I read that as pheromones for some reason.

Not sure why since they are not even close to being spelled the same.




File: 348942e1db778ef⋯.mp4 (779.95 KB, 202x360, 101:180, Subscribe to my channel _).mp4)

 No.39482[Reply]

Post cute little girl Youtube channels.

 No.39492


 No.39571

Last scan had 56 of 500 that are worth checking in full quality, instead of the usual 100-125 - I guess summer is officially over


 No.39580

>>39571

has your imageboard outreach ever convinced even a single other person to join you in your autistic quest to scrupulously catalogue thousands of worthless youtube scraps




File: 018c16c52c7bde3⋯.jpg (12.26 KB, 799x293, 799:293, 799px-Ls-studios_logo.jpg)

 No.35928[Reply]

Why does most of the CP come from slavic countries like Russia and Ukraine?

23 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39567

>>39545

>>39547

>Please talk to somebody about your anger issues.

>What a worthless subhuman coward you are. Kill yourself.

Am I missing something?


 No.39570

>>39567

Notice how the only other person to respond to your "valid" points (no they were you disgusting animal) was also telling you how wrong you were?

If a pathetic cowardly faggot is too scared to read a post, there's nothing left to do but call it exactly what it is, a faggoty coward.


 No.39574

>>39570

>no they were you disgusting animal

Do you even English bro?

Also, you really like that word faggot. Have any repressed feelings you need to come out with? :)


 No.39576

File: 0a71f8aa3f0f494⋯.jpg (55.97 KB, 734x538, 367:269, But then i can use this pi….jpg)

>>39574

Leave it to the faggot to try to swing low and still miss. You are the picture of pathetic.


 No.39577

>>39576

>still keeps using the word faggot

I don't even need to read the caption in that photo, to know it is an artist rendering of your face :)




File: 3f256b2e0daa1db⋯.gif (1.96 MB, 200x225, 8:9, 1506298608280.gif)

 No.38567[Reply]

Post pedo-related threads

 No.38568


 No.38570


 No.38659


 No.39421

>>38659

A inactive account?


 No.39559

>>39421

Yeah. He was a good activist while he was still active though.




File: 517c682db1c907d⋯.jpg (107.6 KB, 1024x683, 1024:683, 1433154025946.jpg)

 No.34057[Reply]

This is something i have been thinking about for the past few days now & i can't help but wonder if it's true or not as i struggle with depression but when i see a little girl i immediately feel happy i know i am probably reading way to much into this but is it possible for little girls to cure depression??.

24 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39452

No


 No.39495

>>39452

Why would you think that?.


 No.39533

>>39495

That is not how depression works.


 No.39537

>>39533

>That is not how depression works.

Ever heard of dopamine dumbass?? you honestly can not tell me that a little girl doesn't release dopamine within the brain and make you feel good.


 No.39541

>>39537

You really don't understand depression or how it works.

A little shot of dopamine will not do anything for actual depression. The things that would normally bring joy at best don't and at worst make one's misery worse.

When it is really bad just existing is cause for great emotional pain. The only thing you have energy for is to lie in bed ruminating on how terrible you are and everything else is is the worst.




File: ed02ff52adeee0e⋯.png (393.43 KB, 600x400, 3:2, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.37832[Reply]

Anyone else here wish they themselves were a little girl or a little boy?

35 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39128

>>39121

This is getting into the territory of "no true pedophile"

>They don't care about the childish way, or things, like, innocence and shit.

>They would as well prefer a person who had a child body but a totally adult mind, and acted exactly as adults. Tiny adults.

First of all thats not even true or possible. Most of the guys and possibly girls I've known in many years of being around the scene is that they want young girls to be able to do adult things, not that they think of them as adults or that they look like adults.


 No.39129

>>39121

>>39128

By the way I forgot to ask, what exactly do you consider to be the "childish way" and innocence?

Should a 5 year old still talk like a 2 year old? or does that ruin the childish way for you?


 No.39133

>First of all thats not even true or possible.

Is it impossible that some pedos (there are a bunch of pedos out there, let's remember), but is it impossible that some pedos only care about the childish body, and don't care at all about the childish mind? Let's remember my statement:

>SOME pedos ( I believe most) are attractive more, like, exclusively by the childish body. They don't care about the childish way, or things, like, innocence and shit. They would as well prefer a person who had a child body but a totally adult mind, and acted exactly as adults. Tiny adults.

I mean, for god sake, there are men, for instance, who don't give a fuck about the women personality as long as she has a nice body and big boobs. I don't see why it would be different with pedos, why the pedophilic attraction, as you defends, would always necessarily includes a personally attraction.

Because you made a pretty absolute statement. Like, I talked with pedophiles who said to me that actually, not only they are not attracted by the childish mind, as some said they actually disliked the childish mind and way So, it seems something pretty absolute statement to be made. To say: "Oh, this not even possible".

>not that they think of them as adults or that they look like adults.

As I said, that's not the impression that I personally had. Especially judging by some photo-sets of little girls that I crossed on the internet, of them dresses like hookers, and dressed in a pretty adult way, like, a bunch of make-up and shit that the most disgusting clothes that usually whores wear.

>By the way I forgot to ask, what exactly do you consider to be the "childish way" and innocence?

The care free-way, I would say. It hard to explain, to put in words. A person who is a little bit emotive sometimes, who says what she thinks, who's very playful and a very silly, who usually assume the best of people. And who dresses on cute clothes with a bunch frilliest dresses and shit like that.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.39135

>>39133

>but is it impossible that some pedos only care about the childish body, and don't care at all about the childish mind?

>I mean, for god sake, there are men, for instance, who don't give a fuck about the women personality as long as she has a nice body and big boobs.

For sure there are pedos that only care about the physical attraction, and are not really interested in personality, but thats a different thing than what you are talking about when you say the "childish mind".

>Like, I talked with pedophiles who said to me that actually, not only they are not attracted by the childish mind, as some said they actually disliked the childish mind

I don't know exactly what you're talking about here, but if you had a conversation with them about the "childish mind" then they might have disagreed with your ideal child mind.

>As I said, that's not the impression that I personally had. Especially judging by some photo-sets of little girls that I crossed on the internet, of them dresses like hookers, and dressed in a pretty adult way, like, a bunch of make-up and shit that the most disgusting clothes that usually whores wear.

>A person who is a little bit emotive sometimes, who says what she thinks, who's very playful and a very silly, who usually assume the best of people. And who dresses on cute clothes with a bunch frilliest dresses and shit like that.

Ok, so now I get it. You have an ideal way a little girl should behave, what they should know, and how they should dress. Am I correct?

By the way, a young girl would be like some of those things regardless if she did "adult things" it doesn't all of a sudden disappear because she's not wearing a cute dress, or is wearing makeup lol

>Should a 5 year old still talk like a 2 year old? or does that ruin the chiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


 No.39534

On the surface it seems fun but all the practical and logistical problems would ruin it. I also wouldn't want to have to go to school again or wait a decade to get mutual respect and equality in interactions and conversations with adults.

It would be awesome to be able to switch back and forth though. You could get the best of both worlds in a way.

I would go kid mode to have fun in the way only kids can get away with(it is generally frowned upon for grown ass men to go buck wild at a playground, climb everything in sight, and in general act like a hyperactive kid). Then go back to adult mode to handle things, remain independent, and do what children aren't allowed.

If I was stuck as a kid Detective Conan style then I would need to form some sort of partnership with a adult that knew and would help me out.




File: f1470b2d78e61dd⋯.png (68.55 KB, 1000x700, 10:7, flutterdashie_kiss_by_nejc….png)

 No.32796[Reply]

I am a "brony". I started watching "My Little Pony" because I knew that little girls liked it, and because there was an adult fan base, so I watched it. I realized that it has substance, and depth. Is this just me? Are there any other pedo's out there that have the same experience? Maybe similar?

17 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.37847

omg <3


 No.38443

bonjour recherche site pedo


 No.38448

File: c33b389be392556⋯.jpg (171.26 KB, 600x591, 200:197, pony.jpg)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ao2Vv-Vd89I

Always wanted to watch this show. <3


 No.38501

>>38448

Yes, very cute show :3 Only last generation however, other gens are mind numbing, even for the cute lg's tbh


 No.39532

I am a fan of animation in general and even from a young age had little problem watching shows targeted towards girls if they were good.

Somewhere online talking about contemporary cartoons worth checking out when someone brought up mlp and I remembered the pretty bad show from the past. They told me there was a new one with major talent behind it and was almost nothing like the older series. I was still a bit dubious but I gave it a shot and greatly enjoyed it.

I didn't engage with the fandom as fandoms just aren't my thing, and mlp's fandom was pretty bad in some ways.

My love of animation and my attraction to minors is not really related, at least in the case of mlp.




 No.39256[Reply]

Not being mean or negative but rather trying to get an idea of what people are thinking.

15 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.39415

>>39406

You sound like an anti trying to set up a trap. FAIL!


 No.39455

>>39398

I think I was arguing with you in another thread, if so fuck you trying to sacrifice people for your own benefit, if not then have a nice day.


 No.39457

>>39398

You really don't have any perspective. It seems you believe in the myth of linear progress.

Name nearly any political or social issue that has been around for more then a hundred or so years and you will often see this political pendulum in action. Same with party afiliation and policy.

Things general don't go one way and stay there. It is not like technology progress nor should it be thought of that way.


 No.39500

>>39455

No. And continue to hide like a coward. Also if you actually cared about kids sacrifice is something you would not hesitate to do, Instead you are selfish putting your needs above the child.


 No.39527

>>39500

Children will be perfectly fine not having romantic/sexual relationships with adults. This is not a time or place to try and use a " think of the children" argument and you probably know it.

Children will not benifit from someone they don't know getting killed or persecuted for for finding minors sexually attractive.

What you have said makes no rational sense and is just a bad attempt at a appeal to emotion.

A appeal that you hope will lead to your hedonistic benefit in the long run.

You don't seem to care about anything but getting your dick in a child without consequence. And you are all too willing to make others pay a blood sacrifice for the opportunity.




Delete Post [ ]
[]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / abdl / asmr / hwndu / irc / just / strek / sw ]